-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- RL CRABB on A Night To Remember
- Hugh Pitts on A Night To Remember
- Chas Monchichi on Arthur
- Tom Odachi on The Love Of My Life
- Barry Pruett on Laura Loonie Comes To Town
Categories
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
For the past five years or so I’ve listened to the California Urbans ridicule the Jefferson movement for wanting more control of their lives and their resources. Many of the affected counties rejected Jefferson because they knew it was doomed to fail. But now, if the “Yes California” movement picks up steam, you can count on the eastern portions of California, Oregon and Washington to demand independence from the coast, and stay in the U.S.A.
Does that mean I’ll have to move again?
Just to Placer County. You can probably see it from your house.
Those who believe they can’t do better and therefore deserve a piece of their neighbor’s success are definitely looking for a viable Plan B.
Bob, after I chuckled at the cartoon I realized that you were also being a bit disingenuous. I think that comparing the State of Jefferson and a new country made up of California and probably Oregon, Washington, and Nevada, is false equivalence.
George, your Great Divide meme is tired and you should really seriously consider giving it up. If you don’t like the fact that Nevada County is blue and getting bluer, you should just move to Idaho and stop whining. And while I’m at it, let’s talk about your claim this afternoon in your latest missive at RR that “we didn’t protest Obama’s election even though we we knew it would be a giant backward step for America.” As you well know, two years into Obama’s presidency, just before the 2010 mid-terms, McConnell said in a National Journal interview that “the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” So I’m going to assume that when the Democratic Party also puts forth the same call to action before the 2018 mid-terms, you will be perfectly fine with that since I don’t remember you protesting McConnell’s comment in 2010. If you did protest McConnell’s statement I’d appreciate if you could provide the citation. I searched RR and couldn’t find it.
The attempt here to draw a moral equivalence between a Senate Minority Leader who identifies their main goal to be for his party to regain the Presidency (by legal, political means) and a temper tantrum involving riots and even some arson by angry losers, is ludicrous. I doubt any Senate Minority Leader faced with a President, Speaker and Senate Majority leader of the other party would think any differently.
No, the Rebanes of the country weren’t rioting in 1992, 1996, 2008 or 2012 when their guy lost.
The last numbers I saw for Nevada County were 48% Clinton, 44% Trump, percentages a Real Clear Politics poll would consider a toss-up. NC also voted against the Newsom gun control measure and may well have given a thumbs down to a school bond measure. State senate and ass’y seats went Red. Blue? It may well be headed in that direction but at the moment it would seem at the least to be a competitive county.
Right now, the national Democratic Party is in a shambles and the riots are not helping your image. Party Faithful, heal thyself.
Gregory —
I apologize for not explaining myself clearly enough for you to understand. If you’ll reread what I wrote, I said nothing about riots or arson. I was talking about “protesting” the very legitimacy of an elected president’s mantle to lead. In McConnell’s case, he said that the #1 Priority was to ensure that Obama was a one-term president. When asked if that meant he wanted Obama to fail, he replied “I don’t want him to fail, I want him to change.” Specifically what he meant was that if Obama didn’t allow the repeal of Obamacare, and also support specific tax cuts that he wanted carried over from the Bush administration, he had no choice but to shut down all cooperation with the Obama administration and destroy his presidency.
Since I didn’t get a response from George–and perhaps you are his designated spokesperson on Bob’s blog–I’d really like to get some clarification about what progressive behavior will be acceptable to George. Given his comment today that the only constitutional amendment he would willingly entertain would be something he calls “Goose Gander,” I’m curious if he would be OK with extending that to progressives everywhere saying that their #1 Priority is to ensure that Trump is a one-term president, unless Trump is willing to keep Obamacare intact as well as maintaining Obama’s fiscal policy.
Just so we’re clear about where I stand, there is absolutely no doubt that Donald Trump suffers from at least one psychiatric disorder (NPI) and perhaps several others. His control of the nuclear football is terrifying and this fact underlines why everything about his presidency must be vociferously opposed. Again, going back to the many anti-Obama strategies, I am particularly drawn to the birther issue which was a brilliant meme that definitely contributed to Obama’s governance difficulties. I am thinking about making up some nonsense about Trump–maybe he led a child-porn ring, or financed a death squad to kill minorities on Staten Island–and then just beating that drum like an idiot between now and 2018. I notice that George never apologized (like Trump sort of did) for contributing to the the birther crap, as he did here: http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2011/06/ruminations-7jun2011.html. Under the guise of “protest,” is George OK with this strategy beneath the Goose Gander umbrella?
Michael A.
Mike, I’m sorry you misunderstood my understatements as misunderstandings. Let me try again.
Eight years of Obama has left him with relatively high personal approval numbers (people like him personally); however, while he turned that personal magnetism into two terms, the Democratic Party has been shattered to its core. Beginning in January the GOP controls the presidency, the Senate, the House, two thirds of Governerships, two thirds of all state legislatures. This is a historic overturning of Democratic power, giving the GOP back the stature they last had *before* FDR, back in the 1920’s, nearly a century ago.
While that sinks in, it appears at least one but quite possibly two or three SCOTUS nominees will fall into this president’s lap, giving the country a constitutionalist high court of 5/4, 6/3 or even 7/2 majorities; that could leave a mark for a half century… consider that all the ugliness in politics started with the Borking of Bork, a Reagan appointee in the ’80’s…. and Justice Kennedy (a fine moderate who tends to be the dealmaker at the moment) was the nominee Reagan had to settle for.
I’d be happier about all the above were I a Republican, but I’m overjoyed to have had Johnson on the ballot and, in the coming years, a Supreme court that, I expect, will be more friendly to liberarian interpretations of the Constitution for decades to come than had Clinton won. This is a good thing.
Republicans working to defeat Democrats, and Democrats working to defeat Republicans, is what they are supposed to do. If they can’t win elections they can’t get their agendas enacted. McConnell was doing his job, and the result as of now is an invigorated GOP with a more than decimated Democratic Party and the credibility of their lickspittles in the media in tatters. Congratulations Mike, you won the battles and have now lost the war.
I fully expect much kicking and screaming by the next Senate Minority Leader desperate to limit Trump to one term and regain Senate and House majorities… as the oldest first term President-Elect in history (I think that’s right) that’s probably the case for Trump, but in 2018 over half of the Democratic seats in the Senate are up for reelection and they will have their hands full just to keep relevant. No, I won’t be whining the Senate loyal opposition isn’t being nice to Trump in 2018… I might as well be upset that water is wet.
Enjoy the upcoming supervisors elections. Savor the wins. There are a number of younger GOP pols moving up the ranks but the problem that comes with losing their grip of state and local governments (outside CA and a handful of other Dem strongholds) is that the Democratic younglings aren’t there to be groomed for the top jobs. Ouch. Get on that, will you?
Thanks Greg (and George), I’ll take that as a “yes.”
Greg is right on one point: it really is a false equivalency to compare McConnell’s reaction to Obama, on purely political grounds, to tens of thousands marching in the streets in protest of a President-elect they see as a morally-deficient sociopath. McConnell’s statements weren’t aimed at Obama’s character as a person; they were one political faction declaring it’s opposition to another. Had the President elect been McCain or Romney, you would have seen the usual griping, but nothing on this order. Even the highly disputed elections of W didn’t cause such a reaction.
No, these protests are because of asinine statements during the campaign by the candidate himself, which some were able to overlook, that show him to be the worst choice possible for the most powerful position on the planet.
And while we’re on the subject of false equivalency; if the actions of the most radical among us taints the arguments of the majority, then no one has a legitimate leg to stand on. Claiming that the destruction brought about by a few anarchists nullifies the concerns of the majority is an ignorant position that even those who state it know not to be true. It reduces us all to the will of the most idiotic.
And, speaking of idiots, congratulations America, you just threw the rabbit in the briar patch. That’ll show ’em.
Michael – In this crazy mixed up country there is no equivalence or rhyme or reason. Anything is possible, and remember that long ago a handful of rural counties ended up becoming the state of West Virginia to stay connected to the U.S.
RL, it made for a great ‘toon, but there really isn’t an equivalence between the SOJ effort to carve a 51st State from OR and NorCal, and the silly noises about a secession from the USA by Baghdad by the Bay and its more provincial neighbors. I doubt that would last as long as the Great Republic of Rough and Ready.
That Jeffersonian of yours would soon have had hisself a bear rug if he’d had his d’ruthers.
It’s all a hypothetical wet dream for either state or country. I’m only pointing out that if the coasters actually got their wish that the rural counties would likely revolt. The Jeffs would hardly sit still for being tied to the new socialist utopia.
Bob,
Don’t get me wrong, I’m actually sympathetic to those who support the State of Jefferson. The rural counties need better representation in Sacramento. It’s just that the SoJ governance plan is a mess–when I asked Eddie Garcia last year where the Jefferson state capital was going to be located, he told me that they didn’t need one, that the counties would rotate the capital duties via a mobile home. Seriously.
The secession of west coast states has a much higher hurdle to overcome but at least the advocates understand the complexities of governance.
Regarding how to prevent these general feelings of disenfranchisement, this is a great place to start: http://www.fairvote.org/reform_2020_agenda#a_national_popular_vote_for_president
The replacement of the Electoral College by a national popular vote was supported yesterday by both Trump on “60 Minutes” and Newt Gingrich on “Face the Nation.” The time has come.