Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Maria Bartiromo were outed last week for tweets that revealed they lied through their teeth during the 2020 election, claiming that Dominion voting machines were rigged to favor Joe Biden when they knew it was a lie. How any thinking human can believe anything they say is one of life’s continuing mysteries.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- RL CRABB on A Night To Remember
- Hugh Pitts on A Night To Remember
- Chas Monchichi on Arthur
- Tom Odachi on The Love Of My Life
- Barry Pruett on Laura Loonie Comes To Town
Categories
Archives
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
One way to test an idea is to it to an extreme and consider whether it still seems valid. I’ll try this in regard to “How any thinking human can believe anything they say is one of life’s continuing mysteries.”
I’ll begin by telling a lie. “I have never told a lie.” I’ll now say, “A dusting of snow fell in my neighborhood this morning.” Can I be believed about the snow?
So we must assume that the Fox anchors were wildly taken out of context and they meant the exact opposite of what they said, just as The Donald was when he urged his mob to reverse the 2020 election results by “peacefully” storming the Capitol.
Apparently there is no amount of evidence that will ever cause a true MAGA believer to doubt the word of Murdoch’s prophets, which should be properly spelled as profits.
This was about none of those things but was instead entirely about your invalid conclusion.
Michael you are granting absolution to Fox News for repeated lies. Your example is simply a false equivalency. Defending Fox for being liars, proven over and over, doesn’t change the fact that Fox is lying. Bob’s conclusion wasn’t invalid, it was a validation of what has been shown. And Tucker, Maria, Laura and Sean were caught in the act.
If I had absolved or defended anybody I would have had to refer to them directly or with third-person pronouns. Free your mind from fear and hate, Ken, if only for a moment, and see that what I said is universally true. Or do you not believe that snow fell in my neighborhood this morning?
You, as do a great many people, appear to believe that Carlson, Bartiromo, Ingraham, and Hannity themselves decide what to report and how to report it but nothing could be further from the truth. Their producers control these things and the network’s executives decide for the producers. It would be easy to conclude that if you don’t understand this then you understand nothing about the television news business but that would be incorrect for the same reason that having lied doesn’t make one incapable of telling the truth.
My mind is free of hate and of fear Michael. Quite simply I don’t give a damn if snow fell in your yard, but I care when a major “News” organization relies on lies to boost the bottom line.
When did you become an expert on the TV news business? Watching a lot of TV hardly makes one an expert.
The point is not whether it snowed but whether, having told an obvious lie, you believe me when I report that it snowed.
Here is news: They have all lied to boost their bottom lines.
I have worked in television and have direct experience with how it’s done.
When Dominion Voting Systems gets through running Fox Corp. through the ringer, Fox News will have to change its tag line to “We distort, you decide.”
The Big Kahuna hisself confirms the news… https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/27/media/dominion-fox-news/index.html
It appears to me that Murdoch is throwing his program hosts under the proverbial bus.